Nuclear Explosion in Iran or Just an Earthquake?
The October 5 earthquake fuels speculation about Iran’s nuclear capabilities

A 4.6 magnitude earthquake struck Iran on October 5, with tremors felt as far as Israel. However, behind this natural event, many people are questioning whether it was actually a nuclear test concealed by the Iranian government. The proximity of the earthquake to ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region has led to theories attributing the tremor to a secret nuclear test by Iran.
An Earthquake or a Nuclear Test?

The epicenter of this earthquake was located 10 km below the surface in the Iranian province of Aradon. Some observers believe that this depth could be linked to an underground nuclear explosion rather than a natural event. The idea behind this hypothesis is that Iran might have chosen to test its nuclear capabilities underground to prevent the spread of radiation. The country, which has declared enemies such as Israel and the United States, might be seeking to prove the functionality of its nuclear weapons in case they need to be used in a conflict.
Additionally, it is well known that Iran houses underground military bases and infrastructure, which strengthens the belief that the country could be conducting nuclear tests in secret. For many experts, this underground explosion would be a crucial step in demonstrating Iran’s ability to retaliate against its enemies in the event of an attack.
The Geopolitical History of Iran
Historically, Israel and the United States have expressed concern about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Their main fear lies in the possibility that the country could develop a nuclear weapon capable of targeting strategic sites, such as military bases or even civilian areas. If Iran were to become a full-fledged nuclear power, it would fundamentally alter the balance of power in the region, forcing Israel to reassess its military strategies.
Many analysts believe that Iran’s policy of burying its military infrastructure underground is a direct response to the threat posed by Israeli and American airstrikes. These countries often rely on preemptive airstrikes to neutralize enemy targets before any ground offensive. This modus operandi has been observed several times over the past decades, notably during conflicts in Vietnam or Iraq.
Read More: Air fares soar: The consequences of a global political conflict
Public Perception
Following this earthquake, numerous reactions emerged on social media and in the press. Some online users claimed that Iran had officially become a nuclear power since this test, allegedly conducted secretly 10 km underground. Others suggested that the explosion might have been calibrated to minimize radiation, thereby avoiding any immediate international repercussions.
These speculations were reinforced by statements asserting that Iran wanted to test a bomb with extreme precision, capable of striking any strategic point. According to a widespread comment, this earthquake could very well be the physical manifestation of such a test, fueling fears of an imminent war with Israel, which could react to any nuclear provocation.
Nuclear Power as a Deterrent
History has shown that nuclear powers are rarely targeted directly. The examples of Russia or North Korea, which have never faced direct invasions despite tensions with the West, are evidence of this. Nuclear deterrence seems to be effective. In this context, Iran might seek to prevent any attack by proving that it possesses the ultimate weapon.
However, uncertainties remain. Even though an underground nuclear test can cause seismic activity, it is difficult to determine whether this particular event was indeed a nuclear test or simply an earthquake. Iranian nuclear facilities, like the one in Natanz, are deeply buried underground, reinforcing the idea that Iran has the technical capabilities to conduct such a test discreetly.
Read More: Conflict in Ukraine: African leaders face Ukrainian politicians’ contempt in their quest for peace
The Legitimacy of Nuclear Weapons
Another debate revolves around the legitimacy of possessing nuclear weapons. The United States, often seen as a guardian of nuclear non-proliferation, is paradoxically the only country to have used an atomic bomb in wartime, in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This act, which targeted civilian populations rather than military bases, continues to fuel discussions about whether or not it is justified for a country to acquire such weapons.
The U.S. and its allies argue that nuclear weapons should never fall into the hands of “rogue” governments, but this position is seen as hypocritical by some, who point out that current nuclear powers are not immune from criticism for their own use of force.
Has Iran Become a Nuclear Power?
The question that remains is whether Iran has indeed become a nuclear power or if this earthquake was merely a geological coincidence. Israel and its Western allies are closely monitoring the situation, aware that Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon could dramatically reshape the power dynamics in the Middle East.
In the end, whether this was a simple earthquake or a nuclear test, this event underscores the need for countries to protect themselves from external threats. Nuclear deterrence remains a powerful tool in the arsenal of nations, but it raises complex ethical and geopolitical questions that continue to divide the international community.