The Apparent Injustice of Financial Institutions
In our society, it’s common to hear the phrase: “To those who have, more will be given; and to those who have not, even the little they have will be taken away.” At first glance, this idea may seem profoundly unfair, but it reflects a harsh reality in our world, particularly in finance.
Banks exemplify this phenomenon. When an individual applies for a loan, financial institutions conduct an evaluation of their situation. They check if the person has a bank account, if they repay their debts on time, if they pay taxes, and assess all financial transactions. Ironically, if the applicant has limited funds, the bank is less likely to grant a loan. In fact, to lend money, banks seek signs of financial stability and solvency. This condition may seem contradictory because people apply for loans precisely because they need money.
This paradox highlights a crucial truth: banks prefer to provide financial opportunities to those who already possess resources, reinforcing the idea that to receive more, one must already have. Conversely, those lacking adequate resources often remain excluded from banking offers and benefits.
Preferred Offers and Client Selection
This principle of exclusivity isn’t limited to banks but extends to various societal domains. More prosperous clients are frequently courted by institutions offering goods or services, like real estate or luxury financial products. These institutions directly contact them, presenting personalized offers and advantageous financing options. This creates a kind of virtuous cycle for the wealthy, while those who show less activity or financial stability remain ignored.
Read More: The Principles of Strong Men: Dignity, Commitment, Punctuality, and Independence
Preserving One’s Aura: A Choice of Dignity
Knowing how to maintain one’s dignity, even in times of extreme need, can be more important than seeking help. A poorly placed request, or one directed to the wrong person, can undermine self-esteem or the image others have of us. In times of need, it’s better to carefully select whom to approach, as a rejected request can impact both self-esteem and the perception one projects.
Additionally, sometimes revealing one’s lack or figurative “hunger” can weaken one’s social position. In some situations, keeping one’s needs private serves to preserve personal aura and avoids vulnerability. At times, silence and quietly enduring difficulties can be preferable to risking a diminished reputation in the eyes of others.
The Trap of Negotiation and Self-Esteem
Another often misunderstood aspect in society is negotiation in specific contexts. In certain places, negotiation is frowned upon. For instance, if someone enters a luxury store, or even a more typical place, negotiating the price can be perceived as a sign of weakness. This drastically changes others’ perceptions. People present might whisper about them, interpreting their actions as a sign of limited means. This scenario illustrates how someone’s aura can be altered by behaviors that seem trivial at first glance.
In the case of purchasing high-end items, like a luxury car such as a Ferrari or Bugatti, the buyer sometimes has to meet specific criteria to be accepted. These brands skip advertising and prefer to reserve their products for those deemed “worthy” to own them. Here, money isn’t the only factor; image, status, and aura also play a crucial role.
Read More: Learning to Protect Oneself: Lessons from a Life of Silent Success
The Dangers of Overexposing One’s Weaknesses
In this society of appearances, how we express our needs or expectations has a direct impact on others’ opinions. Exposing oneself openly in hopes of receiving help, especially when that help isn’t guaranteed, can be seen as a sign of weakness or dependence. Often, silently enduring suffering is preferable, as it preserves the image of strength and dignity one wishes to project.
The conclusion of this philosophy, which may seem harsh, is that under certain conditions, it’s better to suffer in silence rather than openly display vulnerability without assurance of support or comfort. This approach preserves a form of respect, both for oneself and in the eyes of others. Those seeking assistance should carefully choose whom to approach and ensure they are addressing people they trust.
Knowing When and How to Ask: A Social Strategy
Knowing whom to ask is a crucial social skill, often overlooked. It’s essential to remember that any request made indiscriminately risks rejection, which affects not only others’ perceptions but also self-esteem. Asking targeted, trustworthy people is a way to preserve one’s aura and protect oneself from negative responses that could tarnish one’s self-image.
Conclusion: Finding the Balance Between Need and Appearance
This reflection on aura, appearance, and others’ perceptions reminds us that in our society, image plays a crucial role. Financial institutions, social relationships, and even the act of asking are governed by unspoken rules that influence how we see others and behave. In this logic, it’s sometimes necessary to withhold requests and endure silently to preserve dignity and respect, as the aura we project can be an asset in a world where perceptions hold significant importance.
